Perceived Effect of Monetary Policy Measures on Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) and Funding of Universities in Nigeria

Authors

  • Friday Oko Orji Founder of EduNova Digest, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1366-3455
  • Ifeanyi Francis Ikedimma Department of Educational Management and Policy, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria
  • Mercy Obianuju Nwogbo Department of Educational Management and Policy, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.5120243657

Keywords:

monetary policy measures, internally generated revenues, university funding, banking and finance lecturers

Abstract

The study looked into the perceived effect of monetary policy measures on internally generated revenue (IGR) and funding of universities in Nigeria. Ex post facto design was adopted for the study. Two hypotheses were tested at 0.05 alpha level. The sample size of 60 was drawn the through multistage procedure. A researcher’s developed instrument, 'Effect of Monetary Policy Measures on IGR and Funding of Universities Questionnaire (MPMIGRFUQ)' was used to collect data. The Cronbach Alpha method, with the coefficient of 0.92 was used to ascertain the reliability of the instrument. T-test was adopted for analysis and testing of the hypotheses. It was found that the mean ratings of male and female lecturers of banking and finance lecturers with regard to the effect of monetary policy measures on IGR and funding of universities did not differ significantly. The study recommended among others opinions that more researches through primary data should be carried out beyond the scope of opinions of banking and finance lecturers, by involving respondents from different walks of life, for more inclusive and reliable outcomes.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-29

How to Cite

Friday Oko Orji, Ifeanyi Francis Ikedimma, & Mercy Obianuju Nwogbo. (2023). Perceived Effect of Monetary Policy Measures on Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) and Funding of Universities in Nigeria. Social Education Research, 5(1), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.5120243657